hello , I have a Question on you Map Makers, what finds its Better? MED or NILE?
I strained on your answers.
wtf
ZAK
hello , I have a Question on you Map Makers, what finds its Better? MED or NILE?
I strained on your answers.
wtf
ZAK
Last edited by ZAK; 10-17-2015 at 06:09 AM.
Not Even close Med. Nile was never even finished.
Heres a list of things you can do with the med that Nile Can't:
Use area triggers, That is how Nova put toxic water on the map. Mappers can use a work around ie ssn near ssn wac script to trigger events but its not near as good as an area trigger.
Use groups to trigger events.
Create a bin file and add place names, name the ai in coop or single player missions. Mission goals and be able to get them checked off as you play the mission.
Create almost all of the events, With Nile you need to write wac script for most of them.
With Nile most mappers fix the map with another utility (messed up way points and other things Nile breaks.) With another utility.
Med is much more stable, Nile crashed and scrambled way points on every map I used it for but dm maps.
There are other things Nile wont do also this it just a short list.
The only good thing about Nile was the world view so you can see what the map looks like as you build it. If your building maps with no events it's good to use if it doesn't crash. other wise it's a waist of time.
My 2 cents any way.
Hello Reaper, Thanks for you Answer, I hope I hear more Opinions of others Map Makers.
ZAK
Last edited by ZAK; 10-17-2015 at 06:09 AM.
I too strained on the answer
wtf
cheers
Lol Reaper, and I think my English is very Bad
wfg
ZAK
Last edited by ZAK; 10-17-2015 at 06:09 AM.
What I can't understand is the -> wtf <- in the sign offs.... I know what it usually stands for, and it seems an odd way of saying Sincerely or Regards... or whatever...
Niles Little Helper is going to shareware, pay to use just to get some of the things med gives for free.
Yes, this is True.
wfg
ZAK
Last edited by ZAK; 10-17-2015 at 06:10 AM.
Heres a nice thread about NLH: http://www.action-inside.com/showthread.php?t=18000
Oldman brought in a friend to do defense for his actions. oh what fun and lets see if i get banned...
anyway Nile is an incomplete program, Med is incomplete as well but functional enough to not need a third party to even make a coop/sp map. Hell oldtimers using the C4 Med will have no problems migrating to the DFX med. and i actualy prefer wireframe and not world view.
I could care less if NLH went pay to use and always thought Nile was a peice of junk. I started using the med as soon as DFX was released and found out that med worked for Joint Ops. But I can understand why mappers are angry over the way Old Man handled this.
That being said the real ass hats here are NOVA LOGIC. Lets go back in history a bit. Nova released JOTR with no map maker. When mappers complained Nova said we would get one soon. Soon turned out to be many months down the road.
I picked up JOTR the first day of release. One of the first things I found out was there was no single player missions, I dont count the training missions. Or death match, hummm well I went to go look at the med to make some. Guess what no med, no map editor of any kind.
When Nova released the first Nile beta, if you could even call it beta. It was missing most of the basic things mappers use. It crashed and you really couldn't make a coop mission with it. Nova didn't even use it for JOTR, they did make a few maps for JOE but no coop.
When mappers complained on the Nova Community Forums we were told, it isn't cost effective to pay someone to work on mapping software. If I remember correctly the lead programmer for Nile left Nova not long after the JOE was released.
But I was able to create enough Dm maps to run a server for the guys I play with. Then Nova released a patch and broke dm for JOTR. At that time I had enough of Nova. No decent map editor and all the maps I had created some of these were coops also were toast. The patch broke other things besides just dm.
I am not gonna bash Nova here for thier game support. I am just saying the real issue here isn't a guy who programmed a third party utility to fix stuff in Nile and now wants to get paid for it. The problem is with Nova releasing a map editor that doesn't work.
With that said I have a question for those of you who map. If Nova was to decide they were going to charge for a map editor.
Would you pay for it?.
If you wouldn't. Would it turn you way from buying the game at all?.
If you would, how much would you be willing to pay?.
I'll start, I made over 50 dm maps, around 25 coops, and around 15 single player missions. in a 2 year period. I consider mapping part of the entertainment I buy Nova games for. I spend more time mapping than playing.
If Nova started putting mapping software out you had to pay for. I would want to sample the software before I paid for it because of the game support I have seen.
If it worked I would be willing to pay up to 30 dollars if it was a game I was going to spend a few years on.
As a side note after mapping for C4, and BHD Once I was able to use the med for JOTR the things you could do in COOP and single player missions were really great. You could design any kind of mission you could think of I have mapped for other games also, The last 1 was GRAW. But no other game gave me the controle over mapping that JOTR does.
I agree with paying for mapping tools. The same goes for modding tools, since I mod much more than I play...
You prepping us for the arrival of the x3di tool ?
__________________________________________________ ___________
Paying for a MOD/Mapping tool is one thing. Ambushing the current users with an expiration of their current tool - forcing them to purchase the newer one - is another matter entirely.
I don't see anything in that thread that warrants a ban. No cheats published, no name calling... I don't see it.
On a matter not discussed...
I checked out NLH when I first saw this thread a couple of weeks ago. There were several factors that prevented me from chipping in 'for the cause' (the main one being... I don't map anymore)....but there were other reasons.IMHO, $10 is too much for a tool that is nothing more than an addon to another tool for mapping. Sell me the tool that does the same thing - without needing the original - and I'm interested even at that price.
- I couldn't get a version even close to the functionality of the new one to see the pro's and con's of the utility.
- I couldn't see the forum with a discussion expressing opinions, complaints and functions of the tool.
- The price. That's right, the price...see below
But in all honesty, basic economics is in my decision too. Despite the declarations otherwise - I see greed - and I'll tell you why. He had tons of users using the free versions. When he looked over the masses using it already, he counted on $10 a head with that crowd. Now he has to keep it - or offer a refund. If he had offered that tool for $2 - he would have had 10x the buyers - essentially doubling his money while and benefiting the WHOLE community.